When you’re managing multiple high-value cases, financing each one individually can create unnecessary pressure. Portfolio litigation funding gives you a smarter way to access capital by leveraging several cases at once instead of securing funds on a case-by-case basis. Whether you’re a law firm or corporate legal team, this funding model can help you reduce financial risk, maintain flexibility, and confidently take on more litigation.
By grouping cases together, you can unlock better funding terms and reduce the risk tied to any outcome. Portfolio funding typically comes with lower costs of capital, less concentration risk, and greater strategic freedom. You gain the ability to fund cases with different risk profiles, timelines, and expected outcomes, all while maintaining steady cash flow. For firms looking to grow or stabilize operations across multiple matters, portfolio litigation funding is a powerful tool that supports both sustainability and expansion
When a company has multiple lawsuits, each has its own unique set of risks. By funding multiple lawsuits, investors can mitigate these risks and even out their returns. Essentially, portfolio litigation funding works by giving investors the ability to balance their portfolio of lawsuits.
Bringing multiple legal matters into one financing agreement fundamentally changes how your firm can operate. Portfolio funding creates a diversified legal investment that reduces exposure to individual case outcomes while providing the capital needed to pursue more strategic litigation.
Instead of tying your funding to a single case, portfolio funding spreads the investment across several. That means if one matter underperforms or takes longer to resolve, it doesn’t derail your entire financial strategy. This diversified structure protects both you and the funder from concentrated risk.
With lower risk, funders are often willing to offer better terms. That translates to reduced costs of capital and more favorable repayment structures. You get to keep more of your recoveries, freeing up resources to reinvest in other areas of your practice or future cases.
Portfolio financing typically unlocks more working capital than single-case deals. That gives you the flexibility to cover case expenses, expand your team, invest in expert witnesses, or confidently manage operational overhead. It’s a strategic way to keep your firm financially agile while taking on complex legal matters.
While portfolio litigation funding offers clear strategic benefits, it’s not the right fit for every firm. There are trade-offs to consider, especially when it comes to cost, funder involvement, and the complexity of managing multiple case types under one agreement.
Because portfolio funding typically involves larger capital commitments, it can carry a higher total cost than single-case financing. Funders may apply more complex interest calculations or performance-based fees, which can add up over time. The key is ensuring that the benefits, greater flexibility, lower risk, and access to capital, justify the overall expense.
Portfolio funders usually take a financial, not advisory, role. They’re focused on the return across the entire case group rather than diving into the details of each matter. If you’re looking for hands-on litigation support or subject-matter guidance, this structure may be less collaborative than other funding models.
Grouping cases together means you’re asking the funder to evaluate different legal theories, timelines, and risk profiles all at once. This complexity can slow down the due diligence process and create communication gaps. It’s important to align expectations early and be prepared to articulate each case’s value within the broader portfolio clearly.
When seeking portfolio litigation funding, it's important to choose a funder who has experience in the field and can provide the level of strategic guidance necessary to ensure the best possible outcome for your lawsuits. Look for a funder who will actively monitor your progress and provide support throughout the entire process. Additionally, consider the funder's track record and ask for references from previous clients. By choosing the right funder, you can maximize your chances of success and potentially increase your overall return.
Portfolio litigation funding can be a valuable tool for companies involved in high-stakes litigation. By funding multiple lawsuits, companies can spread out their risks and potentially increase their overall return. However, it's important to carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of portfolio litigation funding and to choose a funder with experience and a track record of success. With the right funder, portfolio litigation funding can help companies achieve their legal goals and ensure the best possible outcome for their lawsuits.
The strongest litigation portfolios combine cases with different timelines, legal risks, and potential recoveries. This balance helps reduce volatility and makes the overall investment more attractive to funders. If you're considering portfolio litigation funding, it's important to include matters that complement one another, both in complexity and in payout potential.
Business-to-business contract litigation is a reliable anchor in any legal portfolio. These cases often involve clear written agreements, traceable damages, and established legal precedents. Because the facts and outcomes are usually well-defined, contract disputes provide a strong foundation for funders to assess value and timeline, making them ideal candidates for inclusion.
Patent, trademark, and copyright cases tend to carry significant upside potential. They also require deep legal expertise, extensive documentation, and, in some cases, the ability to secure injunctions. These qualities make IP claims particularly valuable in a portfolio setting, especially when paired with lower-risk commercial matters to offset their complexity.
Antitrust litigation can be resource-heavy, but the possible rewards, including treble damages and large settlements, can justify the investment. These cases often involve large corporate defendants, multiple jurisdictions, and lengthy timelines, which makes them useful for balancing out faster-moving or lower-yield cases in your portfolio.
At REMO, we don’t just connect you with capital; we help you build a strategic funding plan that works for your entire case portfolio. Our team analyzes your current and upcoming matters to identify a mix that balances risk and value. From there, we help you package those cases into an investment-ready portfolio that appeals to top-tier funders.
We also guide you through the negotiation process, ensuring you receive favorable terms without sacrificing control over your litigation strategy. Whether new to portfolio financing or looking to refine your approach, REMO brings clarity, structure, and industry relationships that make the process faster, easier, and more effective.
Answers to some of our most commonly asked questions.
The timeline for securing portfolio litigation funding will vary depending on the investor and the specific circumstances of the lawsuits involved.
The exact return will vary from case to case, but portfolio litigation funding has the potential to increase overall return while minimizing risk.
Yes, portfolio litigation funding may be more expensive than traditional litigation funding.
Portfolio litigation funding can help companies with limited financial resources to pursue litigation that they might not otherwise be able to afford.
Traditional litigation funding involves an investor funding a single lawsuit. Portfolio litigation funding involves an investor funding multiple lawsuits.
Any company involved in high-stakes litigation can potentially benefit from portfolio litigation funding.